Step 1
Define the decision
Your service sends who is asking, what they need, which policy version applies, and channel context. The format is the same for live API calls and offline packets.
ML-DSA ready eligibility signals for relying services.
Short answer: Sign-in proves who someone is; AffixIO proves whether they are allowed for this service, scope, and channel - with signed proof for relying parties.
Stateless verification · No standing PII store · ML-DSA ready
UK digital identity programmes need more than authentication. Relying services must know that a user still meets policy at the moment of transaction: age, status, entitlement, or role.
Attribute bundles are often over-shared. Wallet and VC pilots risk new silos unless decisions remain minimal and auditable.
AffixIO approach: AffixIO sits after identity proofing. Subject identifiers enter; service-specific yes or no leaves, optionally signed with ML-DSA for long-lived programmes.
Consume authenticated subjects; return service-specific decisions.
Interoperate with VC ecosystems without mandating one wallet vendor.
Automated services receive the same binary signals as citizen channels.
One verification event, scoped proofs for multiple relying parties.
ML-DSA migration path for government signing keys.
The same three-step model used across AffixIO applies here: describe the decision, evaluate against sources you control, return yes or no with proof.
Step 1
Your service sends who is asking, what they need, which policy version applies, and channel context. The format is the same for live API calls and offline packets.
Step 2
Checks run against registries and rules you authorise. Sensitive fields stay in systems you already operate wherever the design allows.
Step 3
The response is explicit, signed where required, and suitable for audit or partner handoff. AffixIO does not retain the request after the decision.
A thin stateless layer between citizen channels and core departmental systems. It answers eligibility questions; it does not replace case management, payments, or identity providers.
Further reading: technical architecture, what AffixIO is, government data integration.
Decisions after One Login or departmental ID.
Agents and citizens use the same truth layer.
Limit what each relying party learns.
{
"eligible": true,
"proof": "<signed verification artefact>",
"decision_id": "dec_…",
"evaluated_at": "2026-05-15T12:00:00Z"
}
OpenAPI documentation: api.affix-io.com. Integrate via REST, webhooks, or SDKs.
Connect through your API gateway with TLS, mutual authentication where required, and departmental logging.
Run inside your accredited boundary when policy requires on-premise or private cloud.
Validate signed proofs locally where connectivity is limited. See offline verification.
Machine clients receive the same binary signals as citizen channels. See M2M verification.
Built for long-lived programmes that must plan beyond legacy signatures and minimise data held at the verification boundary.
No long-term store of who asked or the attributes inside a request. Supports proportionate DPIA narratives.
Artefacts can use Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA), aligned with NIST post-quantum direction, with optional HSM-backed key ceremonies.
Where policy allows, demonstrate that a rule evaluated to yes without exporting underlying registry content.
Patent pending: AffixIO verification pipeline protected under GB2510622.0 (pending).
See GDPR compliance and privacy policy.
Share your channel mix, assurance constraints, and first use case. We will respond with a practical integration outline.
AffixIO is an independent technology provider. References to UK departments and agencies describe integration patterns for eligible programmes; they do not imply endorsement. Operational deployment is subject to your organisation's assurance, procurement, and data-sharing agreements.