Step 1
Define the decision
Your service sends who is asking, what they need, which policy version applies, and channel context. The format is the same for live API calls and offline packets.
How do defence programmes verify identity at checkpoints without full record disclosure?
Field-ready proofs and registry-backed decisions across defence.
Short answer: Field teams and partner systems receive valid or invalid with signed proof - not full service or personnel records on handheld devices.
Stateless verification · No standing PII store · ML-DSA ready
Programme context
Verification demand spans the single services, Defence Equipment and Support, strategic command programmes, and the defence industrial base. AffixIO supports the pattern of proving a fact once and consuming a consistent decision across channels.
What teams are solving
Field operations, allied exercises, and veterans' services each need trustworthy answers quickly, often with poor connectivity and strict rules on what identity data may appear on devices.
AffixIO approach: Use the same stateless verification core for checkpoints, partner nation eligibility, and civilian support programmes. Offline proofs reconcile when connectivity returns.
Where verification applies
- Field checkpoints
Confirm access when networks are unavailable; reconcile decisions centrally later.
- Joint and allied exercises
Verify participation eligibility without sharing full identity packets to partner systems.
- Veterans' services
Support councils and charities confirming service-linked entitlements.
- Critical national infrastructure
Apply binary access control at defence-adjacent sites.
- Industrial base onboarding
Verify competencies and registration for technicians and engineers.
From request to verified outcome
The same three-step model used across AffixIO applies here: describe the decision, evaluate against sources you control, return yes or no with proof.
Step 2
Evaluate against authority
Checks run against registries and rules you authorise. Sensitive fields stay in systems you already operate wherever the design allows.
Step 3
Return yes or no with proof
The response is explicit, signed where required, and suitable for audit or partner handoff. AffixIO does not retain the request after the decision.
Where AffixIO sits in your stack
A thin stateless layer between citizen channels and core departmental systems. It answers eligibility questions; it does not replace case management, payments, or identity providers.
Your channelsGOV.UK services, contact centres, field applications, partner APIs, and automated agents.
AffixIOStateless verification via API and SDK. Binary outcomes with cryptographic proof.
Your core systemsDepartmental registries, identity, payments, HR, and case tools you already accredit.
Further reading: technical architecture, what AffixIO is, government data integration.
What you can implement
Field-ready proofs
Offline validation with double-spend controls.
Minimal disclosure
Partners receive decisions, not underlying registry exports.
Audit consistency
Signed outcomes suitable for security and internal audit.
Example response (illustrative)
{
"eligible": true,
"proof": "<signed verification artefact>",
"decision_id": "dec_…",
"evaluated_at": "2026-05-15T12:00:00Z"
}
OpenAPI documentation: api.affix-io.com. Integrate via REST, webhooks, or SDKs.
How teams deploy
Managed API
Connect through your API gateway with TLS, mutual authentication where required, and departmental logging.
Self-hosted
Run inside your accredited boundary when policy requires on-premise or private cloud.
Offline and edge
Validate signed proofs locally where connectivity is limited. See offline verification.
Agentic channels
Machine clients receive the same binary signals as citizen channels. See M2M verification.
Cryptography and data handling
Built for long-lived programmes that must plan beyond legacy signatures and minimise data held at the verification boundary.
Stateless by design
No long-term store of who asked or the attributes inside a request. Supports proportionate DPIA narratives.
ML-DSA ready
Artefacts can use Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA), aligned with NIST post-quantum direction, with optional HSM-backed key ceremonies.
Zero-knowledge outcomes
Where policy allows, demonstrate that a rule evaluated to yes without exporting underlying registry content.
Patent pending: AffixIO verification pipeline protected under GB2510622.0 (pending).
UK regulatory alignment
- UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018
- Government Security Classifications (OFFICIAL patterns; higher via your deployment model)
- NCSC cloud security principles
- Service Standard compatible citizen journeys
- Pseudonymised audit metadata for review
See GDPR compliance and privacy policy.
Common questions
Does AffixIO store citizen personal data?
No. AffixIO is stateless verification infrastructure. It evaluates a request against sources you authorise and returns a decision with proof. It does not maintain a standing database of citizens or request payloads.
Can this run offline for field teams?
Yes. Signed proofs can be validated where connectivity is limited, with reconciliation when the device or site is back online. This pattern is used across offline payment and access programmes on affix-io.com.
How does ML-DSA fit in?
Long-lived verification artefacts can be bound with ML-DSA (Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm), supporting post-quantum planning. HSM-backed ceremonies are available where your security policy requires them.
Speak with our team
Share your channel mix, assurance constraints, and first use case. We will respond with a practical integration outline.
AffixIO is an independent technology provider. References to UK departments and agencies describe integration patterns for eligible programmes; they do not imply endorsement. Operational deployment is subject to your organisation's assurance, procurement, and data-sharing agreements.